Introduction essay against gay marriage

Legislatures in every state had passed laws against homosexual behavior well before this, most notably anti-sodomy laws. During the Cold War politicians frequently described homosexuals as "subversives" who undermined national security and patriotism, and described them as Communist sympathisers or a Communist Fifth column.

Introduction essay against gay marriage

It has seemed to me worth while to show from the history of civilization just what war has done and has not done for the welfare of mankind. In Introduction essay against gay marriage eighteenth century it was assumed that the primitive state of mankind was one of Arcadian peace, joy, and contentment.

In the nineteenth century the assumption went over to the other extreme — that the primitive state was one of universal warfare.

This, like the former notion, is a great exaggeration. Man in the most primitive and uncivilized state known to us does not practice war all the time; he dreads it; he might rather be described as a peaceful animal. Real warfare comes with the collisions of more developed societies.

Introduction essay against gay marriage

If we turn to facts about the least civilized men we find proofs that they are not warlike and do not practice war if they can help it.

The Australians have no idea Note. Their fights do not lead to slaughter or spoils or other consequences of victory. Quarrels between tribes are sometimes settled by a single combat between chiefs. They have no political organization, so there can be no war for power.

An Englishman who knew them well said that he knew of serious wounds, but he had known of but one death from their affrays. We are told Edition: Perhaps the converse would be true: We are not astonished to hear that they develop excessive tyranny and cruelty to those who are weaker than themselves, especially to women, and even to their mothers.

This is attributed in great part to head-hunting and cannibalism. In general they know the limits of their own territory and observe them, but they quarrel about women.

In one case only had he heard of war for any other reason; three brothers, Barolongs, fought over one woman, and their tribe had remained divided, up to the time of writing, into three parties.

During his residence in the Bechuana country he never saw unarmed men strike each other.

Respect Minority

They quarrel with words, but generally both parties burst into a laugh and that ends it. A Spanish priest, writing an account, inof the Aurohuacos of Colombia, 5 says that they have no weapons of offense or defense.

If two quarrel they go out to a big rock or tree and each with his staff beats the rock or tree with vituperations. The one whose staff breaks first is the victor; then they embrace and return home as friends. Even our American Indians, who appear in Edition: Wampum strings and belts were associated with peace-pacts and with prayers for peace.

In contrast with these cases we find others of extreme warlikeness which account for the current idea that primitive men love war and practice it all the time.

But if we examine the cases of peacefulness or unwarlike-hess which have been cited, we see that only two or three seem to present evidence of Arcadian peace and simplicity, such as, in the imagination of the eighteenth century philosophers, characterized men in a state of nature.

Probably if we had fuller knowledge these few instances would be much modified. What we see is that men have always quarreled. The cases which have been selected are some of them also those of people who have been defeated, broken, and cowed down.

Another set of examples consists of those in which abstinence from war is due to cowardice, and with it go the vices of cowardice — tyranny and cruelty to the weak.

These cases are calculated to delight the hearts of the advocates of strenuosity. What our testimonies have in common is this: When we undertake to talk about primitive society we should conceive of it as consisting of petty groups scattered separately over a great territory. I speak of groups because I want a term of the widest significance.An essay is a formal piece of writing which describes, analyses or discusses a particular issue.

The most common types are: Opinion essays. They present the writer’s personal opinion of the topic, supported with examples and reasons.

For and against essays. They present both sides of an i. Your introduction should emphatically state what your essay is going to be about. Introduction examples Pro: The recent legalization of same-sex marriage is a great step forward not only for gay people but for human rights in Australia.

Anti Gay Marriage essays Gay marriage should not be permitted. Many people often justify their opposition to gay marriage with reference to their religious beliefs. It rejects natural law created by God. The bible says that lesbian and gay parenting is a sin.

Homosexual couples can not procreate. Now Selling – Call Today! Call Lisbet Mitchell, AllStar Realty at BRAND NEW TOWNHOMES. Madison Place consists of brand new townhouses off .

Introduction. Section 1: Introduction. Tip: This section should include your thesis sentence and will determine if you are for or against gay marriage. Gay marriage is also referred to as same sex marriage.

Same sex relationships occur when men and women are attracted to someone of the same gender as themselves. Gay Marriage Essay / Research Paper Example. June 23, As a result, the church is against the legalization of gay marriages because it can be viewed by the society as promoting.

Crime Against Nature - Gay Mormon History